linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: re-add a newline to RESTORE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070109140424.5f96de69.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:04:24 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, discuss@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: re-add a newline to RESTORE_CONTEXT

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:21 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:

> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 03:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > RESTORE_CONTEXT lost a newline in 
> > commit 658fdbef66e5e9be79b457edc2cbbb3add840aa9:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00559.html
> 
> I don't think we should add such changes for external patchkits.
> 
> In general kgdb shouldn't add any patches at all. If the existing 
> hooks are not enough they should submit their changes needed so
> that it can just work.
> 

But the patch is a bugfix.  Without it, you cannot do

	RESTORE_CONTEXT	\
	.globl ...	\

Was the addition of this restriction to RESTORE_CONTEXT deliberate, or
mistaken?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/