[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701090226340.20773@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:26:45 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
cc: Giuseppe Bilotta <bilotta78@...pop.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
On Jan 8 2007 19:33, Josef Sipek wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:19:48AM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>> As a simple user without much knowledge of kernel internals, much less
>> so filesystems, couldn't something based on the same principle of
>> lsof+fam be used to handle these situations?
>
>Using inotify has been suggested before. That let the upper filesystem
>know when something changed on the lower filesystem.
>
>I think that, while it would work, it is not the right solution.
Because inotify is not recursive yet?
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists