linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.19/2.6.20-rc3 buffered write slowdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:12:02 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.19/2.6.20-rc3 buffered write slowdown

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, David Chinner wrote:

> Well, pdflush appears to be doing very little on both 2.6.18 and
> 2.6.20-rc3. In both cases kswapd is consuming 10-20% of a CPU and
> all of the pdflush threads combined (I've seen up to 7 active at
> once) use maybe 1-2% of cpu time. This occurs regardless of the
> dirty_ratio setting.

That sounds a bit much for kswapd. How many nodes? Any cpusets in use?

A upper maximum on the number of pdflush threads exists at 8. Are these 
multiple files or single file transfers?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/