[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A57333.6060904@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:13:55 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.19/2.6.20-rc3 buffered write slowdown
David Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:04:15PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, David Chinner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The performance and smoothness is fully restored on 2.6.20-rc3
>>>by setting dirty_ratio down to 10 (from the default 40), so
>>>something in the VM is not working as well as it used to....
>>
>>dirty_background_ratio is left as is at 10?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>So you gain performance by switching off background writes via pdflush?
>
>
> Well, pdflush appears to be doing very little on both 2.6.18 and
> 2.6.20-rc3. In both cases kswapd is consuming 10-20% of a CPU and
> all of the pdflush threads combined (I've seen up to 7 active at
> once) use maybe 1-2% of cpu time. This occurs regardless of the
> dirty_ratio setting.
Hi David,
Could you get /proc/vmstat deltas for each kernel, to start with?
I'm guessing CPU time isn't a problem, but if it is then I guess
profiles as well.
Thanks,
Nick
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists