linux-kernel - Re: [mm PATCH 2/6] RCU: softirq for RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:49:59 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mm PATCH 2/6] RCU: softirq for RCU

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:52:48AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> 
> 
> Finally, RCU gets its own softirq. With it being used extensively,
> the per-cpu tasklet used earlier was just a softirq with overheads.
> This makes things more efficient.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> 
> 
> diff -puN include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq include/linux/interrupt.h
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu/include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq	2007-01-15 15:36:43.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu-dipankar/include/linux/interrupt.h	2007-01-15 15:36:43.000000000 +0530
> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ enum
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
>  	HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ,
>  #endif
> +	RCU_SOFTIRQ	/* Preferable RCU should always be the last softirq */
>  };
> 
>  /* softirq mask and active fields moved to irq_cpustat_t in
> diff -puN kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq kernel/rcuclassic.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu/kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq	2007-01-15 15:36:43.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcuclassic.c	2007-01-15 15:36:43.000000000 +0530
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data) = { 0L };
> 
>  /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, rcu_tasklet) = {NULL};
>  static int blimit = 10;
>  static int qhimark = 10000;
>  static int qlowmark = 100;
> @@ -215,7 +214,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
>  	if (!rdp->donelist)
>  		rdp->donetail = &rdp->donelist;
>  	else
> -		tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, rdp->cpu));
> +		raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
>  }
> 
>  /*
> @@ -367,7 +366,6 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
>  					&per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
>  	put_cpu_var(rcu_data);
>  	put_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data);
> -	tasklet_kill_immediate(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), cpu);
>  }
> 
>  #else
> @@ -379,7 +377,7 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
>  #endif
> 
>  /*
> - * This does the RCU processing work from tasklet context.
> + * This does the RCU processing work from softirq context.
>   */
>  static void __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
>  					struct rcu_data *rdp)
> @@ -424,7 +422,7 @@ static void __rcu_process_callbacks(stru
>  		rcu_do_batch(rdp);
>  }
> 
> -static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
> +static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
>  {
>  	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_data));
>  	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data));
> @@ -488,7 +486,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int us
>  		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
>  	} else if (!in_softirq())
>  		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
> -	tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu));
> +	raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
>  }
> 
>  static void rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
> @@ -511,7 +509,7 @@ static void __devinit rcu_online_cpu(int
> 
>  	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_ctrlblk, rdp);
>  	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_ctrlblk, bh_rdp);
> -	tasklet_init(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), rcu_process_callbacks, 0UL);
> +	open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks, NULL);
>  }
> 
>  static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> 
> _
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/