[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070116175355.GF1776@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:53:55 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mm PATCH 3/6] RCU: Fix barriers
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:54:46AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
>
>
> Fix rcu_barrier() to work properly in preemptive kernel environment.
> Also, the ordering of callback must be preserved while moving
> callbacks to another CPU during CPU hotplug.
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
> ---
>
>
>
> diff -puN kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-fix-barriers kernel/rcuclassic.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu/kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-fix-barriers 2007-01-15 15:36:47.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcuclassic.c 2007-01-15 15:36:47.000000000 +0530
> @@ -350,9 +350,9 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(struct rcu
> if (rcp->cur != rcp->completed)
> cpu_quiet(rdp->cpu, rcp);
> spin_unlock_bh(&rcp->lock);
> + rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->donelist, rdp->donetail);
> rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->curlist, rdp->curtail);
> rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->nxtlist, rdp->nxttail);
> - rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->donelist, rdp->donetail);
> }
>
> static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
> diff -puN kernel/rcupdate.c~rcu-fix-barriers kernel/rcupdate.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu/kernel/rcupdate.c~rcu-fix-barriers 2007-01-15 15:36:47.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcupdate.c 2007-01-15 15:36:47.000000000 +0530
> @@ -117,7 +117,18 @@ void rcu_barrier(void)
> mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
> init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 0);
> + /*
> + * The queueing of callbacks in all CPUs must be
> + * atomic with respect to RCU, otherwise one cpu may
> + * queue a callback, wait for a grace period, decrement
> + * barrier count and call complete(), while other CPUs
> + * haven't yet queued anything. So, we need to make sure
> + * that no grace period happens until all the callbacks
> + * are queued.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, NULL, 0, 1);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
> }
>
> _
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists