linux-kernel - Re: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4807377b0701161118g7f15f201yea4a4c16c252a864@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:18:07 -0800
From:	"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
To:	"Allen Parker" <parker@...hunt.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Subject: Re: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression)

On 1/16/07, Allen Parker <parker@...hunt.com> wrote:
> Allen Parker wrote:
> > I have a PCI-E pro/1000 MT Quad Port adapter, which works quite well
> > under 2.6.19.2 but fails to see link under 2.6.20-rc5. Earlier today I
> > reported this to e1000-devel@...ts.sf.net, but thought I should get the
> > word out in case someone else is testing this kernel on this nic chipset.

Upon some further investigation with Allen, I got this info, and it
appears that his system is not freeing MSI irq's correctly.

from our discussion:
> Allen wrote:
>> Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
>> I believe you may have an interrupt delivery problem, due to kernel
>> changes.  When you don't get interrupts delivered correctly, you may
>> not achieve link up.
>>
>> you can try disabling CONFIG_PCI_MSI in the kernel, as another
>> trouble shooting step.  Also, what model motherboard/machine are you
>> using, and please check to make sure your BIOS is up to date.
>
> CONFIG_PCI_MSI seems to fix it as well, however, i'm not sure about
> possible performance implications with leaving it turned off.
>
> Tyan S2927G2NR w/ 2x Opteron 2210 bios rev 1.02 iirc

Also, here is an excerpt of his his proc/interrupts
Allen Parker wrote:
       CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3
498:      1          8        129       8723   PCI-MSI-edge      eth3
499:      0         42        122      17135   PCI-MSI-edge      eth2
500:      0         19        275    1418326   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
501:      0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
502:      0        414         26      25227   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
503:      0         37        264    1418695   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
504:      0          0          0        139   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
505:      0          6        714      22806   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
NMI:    275        207        225        262
LOC:3531851    3531829    3531805    3531778
ERR:      0

The disturbing bit is that on this Hypertransport to PCIe system, his
interrupts appear to be getting registered multiple times on different
IRQ numbers.

help?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/