[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070116191902.GA4192@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:19:02 +0100
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] MMCONFIG: Reject a broken MCFG tables on Asus etc
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 06:27:18AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> This rejects a broken MCFG tables on Asus etc.
> Arjan and Andi suggest this.
And I agree completely with the principle. If you don't know the
chipset on a first-name basis, trash the MCFG unless it's squeaky
clean (or you don't have a choice).
> +static void __init pci_mmcfg_reject_broken(void)
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_mcfg_config *cfg = &pci_mmcfg_config[0];
> +
> + /*
> + * Handle more broken MCFG tables on Asus etc.
> + * They only contain a single entry for bus 0-0.
> + */
> + if (pci_mmcfg_config_num == 1 &&
> + cfg->pci_segment_group_number == 0 &&
> + (cfg->start_bus_number | cfg->end_bus_number) == 0) {
> + kfree(pci_mmcfg_config);
> + pci_mmcfg_config = NULL;
> + pci_mmcfg_config_num = 0;
> +
> + printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: start and end of bus number is 0. "
> + "Rejected as broken MCFG.");
> + }
> +}
> +
If you're going to do a MCFG validation function, and I don't have a
problem with that, you should put the e820 test in it too.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists