[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1wt3ma85z.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:00:56 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
Cc: "<Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 45/59] sysctl: C99 convert ctl_tables in drivers/parport/procfs.c
Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de> writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tuesday, 16. January 2007 17:39, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/parport/procfs.c b/drivers/parport/procfs.c
>> index 2e744a2..5337789 100644
>> --- a/drivers/parport/procfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/parport/procfs.c
>> @@ -263,50 +263,118 @@ struct parport_sysctl_table {
>> + {
>> + .ctl_name = DEV_PARPORT_BASE_ADDR,
>> + .procname = "base-addr",
>> + .data = NULL,
>> + .maxlen = 0,
>> + .mode = 0444,
>> + .proc_handler = &do_hardware_base_addr
>> + },
>
> No need to initialize to zero or NULL. Just list any variable, which is NOT zero
> or NULL.
Agreed. In this case it was left for clarity.
>> + {
>> + .ctl_name = DEV_PARPORT_AUTOPROBE + 1,
>> + .procname = "autoprobe0",
>> + .data = NULL,
>> + .maxlen = 0,
>> + .maxlen = 0444,
>> + .proc_handler = &do_autoprobe
>> + },
>
> Typo here? .mode = 0444 makes mor sense.
Yep looks like it. On my todo.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists