linux-kernel - Re: NFS causing oops when freeing namespace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070117194632.GA1071@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:46:32 +0300
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@...ac.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...hfloor.at, akpm@...l.org,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: NFS causing oops when freeing namespace

On 01/17, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 01/17, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> >> It was the only semi-plausible explanation I could come up with. I added a
> >> printk in do_exit right before exit_task_namespaces, where sighand was
> >> still set, and one right before the spin_lock_irq in lockd_down, where it
> >> had suddenly been set to NULL.
> > 
> > I can't reproduce the problem, but
> 
> I did on a 2.6.20-rc4-mm1.
> 
> > 	do_exit:
> > 		exit_notify(tsk);
> > 		exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
> > 
> > the task could be reaped by its parent in between.
> 
> indeed. while it goes spleeping in lockd_down() just before it does
> 
> 	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> 
> current->sighand is valid before interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() and
> not after.
>  
> > We should not use ->signal/->sighand after exit_notify().
> > 
> > Can we move exit_task_namespaces() up?
> 
> yes but I moved it down because it invalidates ->nsproxy ... 

Well, we can fix the symptom if we change lockd_down() to use
lock_task_sighand(), or something like this,

	--- NFS/fs/lockd/svc.c~lockd_down	2006-11-27 21:20:11.000000000 +0300
	+++ NFS/fs/lockd/svc.c	2007-01-17 22:39:47.000000000 +0300
	@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ void
	 lockd_down(void)
	 {
		static int warned;
	+	int sigpending;
	 
		mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
		if (nlmsvc_users) {
	@@ -334,16 +335,15 @@ lockd_down(void)
		 * Wait for the lockd process to exit, but since we're holding
		 * the lockd semaphore, we can't wait around forever ...
		 */
	-	clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
	+	sigpending = test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
		interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&lockd_exit, HZ);
		if (nlmsvc_pid) {
			printk(KERN_WARNING 
				"lockd_down: lockd failed to exit, clearing pid\n");
			nlmsvc_pid = 0;
		}
	-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
	-	recalc_sigpending();
	-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
	+	if (sigpending)	/* can be wrong at this point, harmless */
	+		set_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
	 out:
		mutex_unlock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
	 }

but this is not good anyway.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/