[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070118223442.GB5404@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:34:42 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5 4/4] sys_futex64 : allows 64bit futexes
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:45:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> include/asm-i386/futex.h:
>
> switch (cmp) {
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ: ret = (oldval == cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE: ret = (oldval != cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LT: ret = (oldval < cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GE: ret = (oldval >= cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LE: ret = (oldval <= cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GT: ret = (oldval > cmparg); break;
> default: ret = -ENOSYS;
> }
>
> Pierre correctly matched the existing style.
Old code doing things wrong is no excuse for new code doing the same
mistake. Much better send a patch to fix up the previous unreadable
mess aswell. Then again some indentation fixups won't help that much
to make futrsx not the totally unreadable spaghetti code it's now ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists