linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5 4/4] sys_futex64 : allows 64bit futexes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070118074556.GB29128@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:45:56 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5 4/4] sys_futex64 : allows 64bit futexes


* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:04:53AM +0100, Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This latest patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall 
> > provided in -rt patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the 
> > use of 64bit futex.
> 
> Big NACK here, we don't need yet another goddamn multiplexer.  Please 
> make this individual syscalls for the actual operations.

actually, we have a big multiplexer there already, so it's only 
symmetric. Nothing is served by doing it half-assed. I raised the issue 
of the multiplexer back when the first futex API was merged (years ago), 
and it was rejected. Now whether you like it or not we've got to live 
with that decision. You are certainly free to introduce a patchset with 
a completely new set of syscall vectors to demultiplex all futex APIs, 
but to just start a half-done demultiplexing makes zero sense.

> > +	if (!ret) {
> > +		switch (cmp) {
> > +		case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ: ret = (oldval == cmparg); break;
> > +		case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE: ret = (oldval != cmparg); break;
> 
> Please indent this properly, the ret = .. and reak need to go onto a 
> line on it's own.

this is the standard (already upstream) arithmetics style there for the 
futex cmp ops, and it expresses things in a compact way. See 
include/asm-i386/futex.h:

                switch (cmp) {
                case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ: ret = (oldval == cmparg); break;
                case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE: ret = (oldval != cmparg); break;
                case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LT: ret = (oldval < cmparg); break;
                case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GE: ret = (oldval >= cmparg); break;
                case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LE: ret = (oldval <= cmparg); break;
                case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GT: ret = (oldval > cmparg); break;
                default: ret = -ENOSYS;
                }

Pierre correctly matched the existing style.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/