[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070121222714.GA2473@atjola.homenet>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:27:14 +0100
From: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Chr <chunkeey@....de>,
Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, htejun@...il.com,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, lwalton@...l.com
Subject: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5
On 2007.01.21 13:58:01 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> >All kernels were bad using that approach. So back to square 1. :/
> >
> >Björn
> >
>
> OK guys, here's a new patch to try against 2.6.20-rc5:
>
> Right now when switching between ADMA mode and legacy mode (i.e. when
> going from doing normal DMA reads/writes to doing a FLUSH CACHE) we just
> set the ADMA GO register bit appropriately and continue with no delay.
> It looks like in some cases the controller doesn't respond to this
> immediately, it takes some nanoseconds for the controller's status
> registers to reflect the change that was made. It's possible that if we
> were trying to issue commands during this time, the controller might not
> react properly. This patch adds some code to wait for the status
> register to change to the state we asked for before continuing.
Just got two exceptions with your patch, none of the debug messages were
issued.
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists