linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1169401892.2999.1.camel@entropy>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:51:32 -0800
From:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
> stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source
> tree that clashes with that change.
> 

If you're going to introduce true and false macros, you should probably
use the official all-lowercase C99 version.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/