linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:46:34 +0100
From:	Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
CC:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

Nicholas Miell wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   
>>   Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
>> stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source
>> tree that clashes with that change.
>>
>>     
>
> If you're going to introduce true and false macros, you should probably
> use the official all-lowercase C99 version.
>   
It is already in there (see include/linux/stddef.h). These are just to 
get rid of the defines of FALSE/TRUE all over the tree.
Not sure why, thou...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/