linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 3/6] bidi support: bidirectional request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:00:21 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, Daniel.E.Messinger@...gate.com,
	Liran Schour <LIRANS@...ibm.com>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] bidi support: bidirectional request

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 01:25 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> - Instantiate another request_io_part in request for bidi_read.
> - Define & Implement new API for accessing bidi parts.
> - API to Build bidi requests and map to sglists.
> - Define new end_that_request_block() function to end a complete request.

Actually, this approach looks to be a bit too narrow.  You seem to be
predicating on the idea that the bidirectional will transfer in and out
of the same area.  For some of the frame in/frame out stuff, we probably
need the read and write areas for the bidirectional request to be
separated.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/