[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45B60A55.6080104@panasas.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:15:01 +0200
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
CC: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, Daniel.E.Messinger@...gate.com,
Liran Schour <LIRANS@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] bidi support: bidirectional request
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 01:25 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> - Instantiate another request_io_part in request for bidi_read.
>> - Define & Implement new API for accessing bidi parts.
>> - API to Build bidi requests and map to sglists.
>> - Define new end_that_request_block() function to end a complete request.
>
> Actually, this approach looks to be a bit too narrow. You seem to be
> predicating on the idea that the bidirectional will transfer in and out
> of the same area. For some of the frame in/frame out stuff, we probably
> need the read and write areas for the bidirectional request to be
> separated.
Hmm, our proposal introduces two separate and independent i/o areas.
One used for uni-directional transfers and for bidi data output, the
other is used for bidi data input so we're in agreement.
Benny
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists