[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070123094114.GE6033@ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:41:15 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alessandro Di Marco <dmr@....it>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0
Hi!
> > +if [ ! -d "/proc/sin" ]; then
> > + echo "/proc/sin not found, has sinmod been loaded?"
> > + exit
> > +fi
>
> No new /proc files, please.
>
> This was merely a prototype realized in a hurry, not a production
> driver. Really, I did't think it could be interesting for anybody.
>
> Would be /sys ok?
If it has to be in kernel, /sys/power is probably ok. But I still
believe it can be out.
Yes, I believe it is interesting: on modern machine, you want to
control keyboard illumination, lower backlight after short inactivity,
turn screen off after longer one, etc...
> Heh. We'll waste power trying to save it.
>
> Well, not just a power saver. For example I use SIN to auto-logoff my bash
> session as well (detaching the screen session.)
Ok, ok :-).
> If you have to hook it into kernel, can you at least do it properly?
>
> Of course. You can find attached a patch fixing this. Now SIN wakes up just
> when it expects to do something: if in the meantime the user interacts with the
> system, SIN simply recalculates the next wake-up time on the basis of the last
> user's activity date and goes to sleep again.
Good.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists