linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement shadow directory support for device classes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:50:17 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement shadow directory support for device classes.

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:37:19PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Modify the device class code so that normal manipulations work
> in the presence of shadow directories.  Some of the shadow directory
> support still needs to be implemented in the implementation of the
> class but these modifications are sufficient to make that simple.

This is a nice idea, but I'm working to get rid of 'struct class_device'
from the tree.  Network devices have already been converted, the patch
is in the -mm tree, I'm working on some firewire fixes before pushing it
to Linus.

So, I think you want to do this work for 'struct device' too, as that is
what will be the real user of this code.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/