[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h7ivbuhg1.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:47:26 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: xiphmont@...h.org
Cc: "Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@...eus.cx>, fedora-desktop-list@...hat.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, jrb@...hat.com,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mclasen@...hat.com, "Lennart Poettering" <lennart@...ttering.net>,
perex@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] alsa: correct nonsensical sysfs device symlinks
At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:30:44 -0500,
xiphmont@...h.org wrote:
>
> > I'm working on this now and will doublecheck just in case my test was
> > flawed first time.
>
> Doublechecking indicates my initial test was wrong somehow; both
> card->dev->parent and card->parent passed as arg 2 to the
> device_create call in snd_register_device result in correct device
> symlinks. Are these two actually semantically different? I'm just
> curious.
If card->dev is created, they should be identical.
But, again, card->dev should be NULL on the older systems.
> The call to device_create in cound_core.c:sound_insert_unit also needs
> to be modified in order for the device symlinks in the other unit
> types to be correct. Again, modifying the 'dev' argument to
> '(dev?dev->parent:NULL)' appears to fix the problem. Is that
> correct/appropriate there?
Your change breaks the expected heavior if CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is
enabled. Then devices won't belong to card* objects any more...
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists