[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701260742340.6141@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:44:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Track mlock()ed pages
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Track mlocked pages via a ZVC
>
> Why?
Large amounts of mlocked pages may be a problem for
1. Reclaim behavior.
2. Defragmentation
> You could perhaps go for a walk across all the other vmas which presently
> map this page. If any of them have VM_LOCKED, don't increment the counter.
> Similar on removal: only decrement the counter when the final mlocked VMA
> is dropping the pte.
For that we would need an additional refcount for vmlocked maps in the
page struct. Looks too expensive.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists