linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/26] Dynamic kernel command-line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0701270034w491ff69dnb6019b4dd30f6d54@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:34:27 +0200
From:	"Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Bernhard Walle" <bwalle@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - ia64

On 1/27/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> no no no no no no no.  Just because some whacked-out weenie went and put
> extern declarations in .c files doesn't mean that we should copy them.
>
> It doesn't even compile.

Sorry... I don't have all environments.

> Please.  Go through the entire patchset, yank all those wrong private
> declarations of boot_command_line[] and put a *single, kernel-wide*
> declaration into a single, shared header file.

I thought of this, while I was making the patch, I could not understand why
the maintainer did not simply #include <linux/init.h>

I can add this to any module which declares this by-itself but because
I cannot test all arch, I am afraid it will cause more problems.

Preparing a patch... :)

Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/