linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V9: mmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45BE3E70.9050505@indt.org.br>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:35:28 -0400
From:	Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@...t.org.br>
To:	ext Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
CC:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Lizardo Anderson (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" <anderson.lizardo@...t.org.br>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Aguiar Carlos (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" <carlos.aguiar@...t.org.br>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	ext David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support
 V9: mmc_sysfs.diff

Hi Pierre,

Sorry about the delay.
I changed a bit the code to align with your latest suggestions.

ext Pierre Ossman wrote:
> I've queued it up for -mm, but there a few more comments I want resolved
> before this can move to Linus...
> 
> You need to clean up mmc_lockable_store(). It had a few broken variable
> declarations that even prevented it from compiling, and after I fixed
> that I still get:
> 
> drivers/mmc/mmc_sysfs.c: In function ‘mmc_lockable_store’:
> drivers/mmc/mmc_sysfs.c:160: warning: ignoring return value of
> ‘device_attach’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
> drivers/mmc/mmc_sysfs.c:93: warning: ‘mmc_key’ may be used uninitialized
> in this function

I'm not getting those errors anymore.
> 
> There's also no handling for an invalid string written to the sysfs node.

I believe now it is ok. If you send an invalid string to sysfs it will return -EINVAL.
> 
> And third, you're a bit excessive on the goto:s. E.g. out_unlocked is
> used in a single place, so it is completely unnecessary. Please do a
> general cleanup of the control flow.

I believe now the number of goto's is ok.

Regards,

Anderson Briglia

View attachment "mmc_sysfs.diff" of type "text/plain" (4394 bytes)