[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A6651BCA-2975-4C5C-9A2C-1B4461B0FEEA@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:32:19 +0100
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
tony.luck@...el.com, grundler@...isc-linux.org, jeff@...zik.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, greg@...ah.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyle@...isc-linux.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, brice@...i.com, shaohua.li@...el.com,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] MSI portability cleanups
> I just got an answer from the hypervisor architects. It turns out
> that the hardware _does_ prevent the device from sending MSI messages
> to another partition. The OS _can_ write whatever it likes to the MSI
> address and data registers. It can potentially lose interrupts (or, I
> expect, get the device isolated by EEH) but it can't disrupt another
> partition.
The OS however has to write the values the HV wants to
the device, or things won't work -- so the HV can just
as well do it itself. Also, pulling all the work into
the HV makes for a cleaner, more generic design (who
knows what hardware will show up within the next few
years, the HV interface had better be prepared).
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists