[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070201042909.GD3648@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:29:09 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...isc-linux.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>, shaohua.li@...el.com,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] MSI portability cleanups
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:09:14AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> If we followed that "only do incrementental changes" rule all the time,
> imagine in what state would be our USB stack today since we couldn't
> have dropped in Linus replacement one ...
Bad example, that is not what happened at all. There was not an
in-kernel USB stack when Linus wrote his. Inaky had his
all-singing-all-dancing stack outside of the tree, and no one was really
helping out with it.
Only when Linus added his code to mainline did we all jump on it and
_incrementally_ improve it to what we have today.
So, in a way, you just proved that we need to do this in an incremental
fashion, which is what I was also saying all along :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists