| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070130024231.GA9497@in.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>@qubit.in.ibm.com Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 > "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org> wrote: > > > > - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to > > > apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation > > > errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to > > > runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added. > > > > dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ? > > OK, I'll dump git-block.patch. That means that the fsaio patches get > temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat. Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ? > > btw, I didn't actually include the list-aio patches in rc6-mm1 due to > various discouraging-looking review comments - I'll be awaiting version 2 > there. Regards Suparna -- Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@...ibm.com) Linux Technology Center IBM Software Lab, India - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists