| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20070129184228.49fd48e7.akpm@osdl.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:42:28 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> To: suparna@...ibm.com Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Sébastien Dugué @qubit.in.ibm.com" <sebastien.dugue@...l.net> Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 > > "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org> wrote: > > > > > > - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to > > > > apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation > > > > errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to > > > > runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added. > > > > > > dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ? > > > > OK, I'll dump git-block.patch. That means that the fsaio patches get > > temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat. > > Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ? Is OK thanks, I now have a git-block minus CFQ changes, so I have restored the fsaio patches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists