[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070131124300.GG1847@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] clocksource tsc: add verify routine
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> I've included this as another user of the clocksource interface. I
> don't see a usage for this across all achitectures. So a fully generic
> version isn't needed.
well, this implementation is buggy in at least two ways:
firstly, it allows a circular verification dependency in highres+dyntick
mode between the jiffies and tsc clocksources.
secondly, verification is not done while the system is booting up:
> static void verify_tsc_freq(unsigned long unused)
> {
[...]
> + if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING))
> + goto out_timer;
so we should just go with Thomas' patch:
clocksource-add-verification-watchdog-helper.patch
which has been based on and tested on actual systems affected by these
problems.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists