[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D277CD72-D8D7-4F93-A82D-209E00DC8055@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:21:41 -0800
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...l.org>, <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Benjamin LaHaise'" <bcrl@...ck.org>, <suparna@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] aio: add per task aio wait event condition
> That sounds like a programming error, don't you think? Maybe
> returning EINVAL is the right approach?
Maybe. I think I'd prefer to be permissive and queue as much as
possible, but it's not a strong preference. Returning EINVAL seems
ok, too.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists