| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 01:24:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frédéric Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:19:51 +0100 Frédéric Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com> wrote:
> Le vendredi 02 février 2007 à 17:55 -0800, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > - I have efi-x86-pass-firmware-call-parameters-on-the-stack.patch, but
> > I'm not sure it's right and unless something really rapid happens, we'll
> > ship with that bug unfixed.
>
> Things I can say:
> - Works for me :-)
> - When you look at the code, it's obvious that switching to -mregparm=3
> changed the way we call into EFI runtime services. If you consider that
> that old code was correct, then the patch is needed to keep the good
> calling convention.
> - It touches only arch/i386/kernel/efi.c which is compiled only with
> CONFIG_EFI && X86
> - It changes code that is called only when booted in EFI mode.
>
> Last 2 points mean the user base is pretty limited, which can be taken
> both as an argument to push it for the release or not to. I'd obviously
> prefer that someone knowledgeable about EFI looks at it and ACKs before
> it goes in.
>
OK, well here it is again for everyone's reviwing pleasure:
From: Frederic Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com>
When calling into the EFI firmware, the parameters need to be passed on
the stack. The recent change to use -mregparm=3 breaks x86 EFI support.
This patch is needed to allow the new Intel-based Macs to suspend to ram
(efi.get_time is called during the suspend phase).
Signed-off-by: Frederic Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: <artiom.myaskouvskey@...el.com>
Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
---
arch/i386/kernel/efi.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/efi.c~efi-x86-pass-firmware-call-parameters-on-the-stack arch/i386/kernel/efi.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/efi.c~efi-x86-pass-firmware-call-parameters-on-the-stack
+++ a/arch/i386/kernel/efi.c
@@ -473,6 +473,70 @@ static inline void __init check_range_fo
}
/*
+ * Wrap all the virtual calls in a way that forces the parameters on the stack.
+ */
+
+#define efi_call_virt(f, args...) \
+ ((efi_##f##_t __attribute__((regparm(0)))*)efi.systab->runtime->f)(args)
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_time(efi_time_t *tm, efi_time_cap_t *tc)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(get_time, tm, tc);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_set_time (efi_time_t *tm)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(set_time, tm);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_wakeup_time (efi_bool_t *enabled,
+ efi_bool_t *pending,
+ efi_time_t *tm)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(get_wakeup_time, enabled, pending, tm);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_set_wakeup_time (efi_bool_t enabled,
+ efi_time_t *tm)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(set_wakeup_time, enabled, tm);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_variable (efi_char16_t *name,
+ efi_guid_t *vendor, u32 *attr,
+ unsigned long *data_size, void *data)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(get_variable, name, vendor, attr, data_size, data);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_next_variable (unsigned long *name_size,
+ efi_char16_t *name,
+ efi_guid_t *vendor)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(get_next_variable, name_size, name, vendor);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_set_variable (efi_char16_t *name,
+ efi_guid_t *vendor,
+ unsigned long attr,
+ unsigned long data_size, void *data)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(set_variable, name, vendor, attr, data_size, data);
+}
+
+static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_next_high_mono_count (u32 *count)
+{
+ return efi_call_virt(get_next_high_mono_count, count);
+}
+
+static void virt_efi_reset_system (int reset_type, efi_status_t status,
+ unsigned long data_size,
+ efi_char16_t *data)
+{
+ efi_call_virt(reset_system, reset_type, status, data_size, data);
+}
+
+/*
* This function will switch the EFI runtime services to virtual mode.
* Essentially, look through the EFI memmap and map every region that
* has the runtime attribute bit set in its memory descriptor and update
@@ -525,22 +589,15 @@ void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
* pointers in the runtime service table to the new virtual addresses.
*/
- efi.get_time = (efi_get_time_t *) efi.systab->runtime->get_time;
- efi.set_time = (efi_set_time_t *) efi.systab->runtime->set_time;
- efi.get_wakeup_time = (efi_get_wakeup_time_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->get_wakeup_time;
- efi.set_wakeup_time = (efi_set_wakeup_time_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->set_wakeup_time;
- efi.get_variable = (efi_get_variable_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->get_variable;
- efi.get_next_variable = (efi_get_next_variable_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->get_next_variable;
- efi.set_variable = (efi_set_variable_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->set_variable;
- efi.get_next_high_mono_count = (efi_get_next_high_mono_count_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->get_next_high_mono_count;
- efi.reset_system = (efi_reset_system_t *)
- efi.systab->runtime->reset_system;
+ efi.get_time = virt_efi_get_time;
+ efi.set_time = virt_efi_set_time;
+ efi.get_wakeup_time = virt_efi_get_wakeup_time;
+ efi.set_wakeup_time = virt_efi_set_wakeup_time;
+ efi.get_variable = virt_efi_get_variable;
+ efi.get_next_variable = virt_efi_get_next_variable;
+ efi.set_variable = virt_efi_set_variable;
+ efi.get_next_high_mono_count = virt_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
+ efi.reset_system = virt_efi_reset_system;
}
void __init
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists