[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702031033.42940.ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:33:42 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frédéric Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions
> /*
> + * Wrap all the virtual calls in a way that forces the parameters on the stack.
> + */
> +
> +#define efi_call_virt(f, args...) \
> + ((efi_##f##_t __attribute__((regparm(0)))*)efi.systab->runtime->f)(args)
> +
> +static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_time(efi_time_t *tm, efi_time_cap_t *tc)
> +{
> + return efi_call_virt(get_time, tm, tc);
Wouldn't it be better to just declare the pointers in efi.systab with
the correct attribute? Then you wouldn't need all that ugly casting.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists