| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:35:34 -0500 From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com> To: "Oleg Verych" <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sam@...nborg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> wrote: > > >proposition is to substitute: > > > "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)" > > >with > > > "mkimage" > > > > this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical > > mkimage-missing scenario ... > > You are interested in presents of `mkimage', but yet we discussing its > missing, or "Error -> Don't care" behavior. i'm interested in having the system work for the Blackfin port and that's it. if people want to redefine the current standard of how u-boot images are generated, then go for it and get the approval of all the existing arches. there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be taking some other form. so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should continue on for inclusion. -mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists