linux-kernel - Re: - search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070208214012.GA28386@flower.upol.cz>
Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:40:12 +0100
From:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sam@...nborg.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: - search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
> there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch
> breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be
> taking some other form.

After all, i was giving negative acknowledgement to only-good-branch
orientation of the patch, and ease of having current script working by
setting up *your* environment. Try to Cc one of maintainers of archs,
where this script is used, to have positive ack.

> so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with
> rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should
> continue on for inclusion.

Goodbye.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/