[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E82298ED5D7@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:59:36 -0700
From: "Patro, Sumant" <Sumant.Patro@....com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kolli, Neela" <Neela.Kolli@....com>, "Yang, Bo" <Bo.Yang@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: megaraid_sas - stop cmd processing if hw_crit_error is set
I will correct the formatting and will resubmit.
Regards,
Sumant
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 1:18 PM
To: Patro, Sumant
Cc: James.Bottomley@...elEye.com; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Kolli, Neela; Yang, Bo; Patro, Sumant
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: megaraid_sas - stop cmd processing if
hw_crit_error is set
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:49:24 -0800
Sumant Patro <sumantp@...l.com> wrote:
> + /* Don't process if we have already declared adapter dead */
> + if(instance->hw_crit_error)
Preferred kernel coding style is "if (".
> [p1-crit_err.patch text/x-patch (1.3KB)]
argh. Please don't send two copies of the patch in the email. Because
the result applies happily with `patch --dry-run' and then creates a
great mess when you try to apply the patch for real.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists