linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] aio: fix kernel bug when page is temporally busy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B41635854730A14CA71C92B36EC22AAC8049D0@mssmsx411>
Date:	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:18:14 +0300
From:	"Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
To:	<suparna@...ibm.com>, "Jiri Kosina" <jikos@...os.cz>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-aio" <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
	"Zach Brown" <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
	"Chris Mason" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	"Badari Pulavarty" <pbadari@...ibm.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] aio: fix kernel bug when page is  temporally busy

>>noone seems to be setting the error values to EIOCBRETRY
> We'd want retries to act only on the remaining bytes which haven't
been
> transferred as yet, so even in the EIOCBRETRY...

OK. But any variable is not set to EIOCBRETRY  in 2.6.14, 2.6.19,
2.6.20.
Is it correct?

Leonid 

-----Original Message-----
From: Suparna Bhattacharya [mailto:suparna@...ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 2:06 PM
To: Jiri Kosina
Cc: Andrew Morton; Ananiev, Leonid I; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
linux-aio; Zach Brown; Chris Mason; Badari Pulavarty; Jan Kara
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix kernel bug when page is temporally busy

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:40:27AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  
> > > @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ generic_file_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
const struct iovec *iov,
> > >
do_generic_file_read(filp,ppos,&desc,file_read_actor);
> > >  			retval += desc.written;
> > >  			if (desc.error) {
> > > -				retval = retval ?: desc.error;
> > > +				retval = desc.error;
> > >  				break;
> > >  			}
> > Nope.  On error the read() syscall must return the number of bytes
which
> > were successfully read.
>  
> You are right. 
>  
> In current mainline this even is not a problem, because noone seems to
be 
> setting the error values to EIOCBRETRY. But it still stinks a bit, as 
> there are tests for EIOCBRETRY.

We'd want retries to act only on the remaining bytes which haven't been
transferred as yet, so even in the EIOCBRETRY case the right thing to do
is to return the number of bytes that were successfully read without
blocking. The high level AIO code (see aio_rw_vect_rety) has the ability
to handle this.

So this is still correct.

Is there a real bug that you are seeing here ?

Regards
Suparna

>  
> -- 
> Jiri Kosina
>  
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
> see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@...ck.org">aart@...ck.org</a>

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/