linux-kernel - Re: Coding style question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490702090318o3acd5ef1t2525afc9c3776e85@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:18:53 +0100
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Pavel Pisa" <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>
Cc:	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Subject: Re: Coding style question

On 09/02/07, Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have question if next style of macros definitions
> for hardware registers is acceptable (tastefull for
> maintainers) for Linux kernel.
>

It is generally preferred to keep macro names all uppercase.
Also, when possible, static inline functions are preferred over macros.

[...snip...]
> found in each source file. If you prefer some already
> utilized style, direct me to right examples, please.
>
Documentation/CodingStyle : Chapter 12: Macros, Enums and RTL

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/