[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45CE2C8C.80306@student.ltu.se>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:35:24 +0100
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old: Convert to generic boolean-values
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 18:46 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
>> Convert:
>> FALSE -> false
>> TRUE -> true
>>
>
> Actually, downcasing true and false in this driver is pretty much a
> retrograde step. The reason for their being uppercased is that they
> represent constants (and uppercase is the traditional defined constant
> specifier).
>
I would argue that 'false' and 'true' are values and not constants, but
further more C99 is defining them in lowercase (stdbool.h).
> When discussion about TRUE and FALSE came up a long time a go in the
> context of the mid layer we agreed to strip the defined constants out of
> that code and just go with 1 and 0 inline ... because the code was
> pretty much being rewritten. We also decided to encourage but not force
> the driver writers simply to use 1 and 0 as well ... a lot of people are
> deeply wedded to the TRUE and FALSE defines, it turned out.
>
As I have expressed before, I don't understand why people seem to
dislike 'false'/'true' but anyway, since you seem to approve booleans,
would it be possible to convert the obvious variables/functions into
boolean-type?
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists