linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] delayed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070210215014.GA2210@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:50:14 +0300
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] delayed_work tweaks

Andrew, unless you stop me right now, I am going to send the following
patches in addition:

	[PATCH] kill cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue()

		cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(wq, dwork) does not
		need the first parameter, it could be figured out from
		dwork. So we can rename it to cancel_rearming_delayed_work
		after the simple change and fix all callers.

		In other words:

			- cancel_rearming_delayed_work(dwork) will work
			  for any workqueue, not just keventd_wq.

			- all callers of cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue()
			  will be converted to use it.

		No? This breaks the public interface, but we already did
		this recently ...

	[PATCH] kill flush_work_keventd()

		The same is true for flush_work(), it doesn't need the
		"struct workqueue_struct *wq" parameter. I missed this
		fact when I was doing flush_work().

		This change is obviously good to do before flush_work()
		goes to mainline.

		Also, I think the name "flush_work" is very bad. Isn't
		it better to rename it as well?

		cancel_work? cancel_work_sync? whatever.

	[PATCH] bonus: mark kernel/workqueue.c as CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

		too many non-reviewed changes ...

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/