[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B41635854730A14CA71C92B36EC22AAC804B02@mssmsx411>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:57:18 +0300
From: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
To: "Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com>
Cc: <suparna@...ibm.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-aio" <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
"Zach Brown" <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"Chris Mason" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"Badari Pulavarty" <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] aio: fix kernel bug when page is temporally busy
Ken Chen writes:
> So any error value returned from invalidate_inode_pages2_range() has
> to be taken seriously in the direct IO submit path instead of dropping
> it to the floor.
If invalidate_inode_pages2_range() will return EIOCBRETRY as the patch
"aio: fix kernel bug when page is temporally busy"
serts then do_sync_read/write() will not drop IO submit but will retry
it:
for (;;) {
ret = filp->f_op->aio_read(&kiocb, &iov, 1,
kiocb.ki_pos);
if (ret != -EIOCBRETRY)
break;
wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb(&kiocb);
}
And do_sync_read/write() will not return EIO if page is busy as it does
now, befor patching.
Curretly do_sync_read/write() tests for EIOCBRETRY. But EIOCBRETRY is
not set ever.
Leonid
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists