| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:38:52 +0000 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: nigel@...el.suspend2.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Hi! > > I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm > > wrong).. > > > > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management > > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not > > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? > > to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than > no device driver at all, right? > now.. if you want to make the core warn about it, that's very fair Well, driver that is broken on SMP is arguably better than no driver at all, yet we'd probably avoid merging that. It would be nice to start including suspend in 'must work' list... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists