linux-kernel - Re: Documenting MS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702121848480.26360@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:49:39 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>,
	val_henson@...ux.interl.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Documenting MS_RELATIME

Hi,

On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
> > > not to make this a default mount option ?
> > 
> > Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time
> > now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu).  I see relatime as
> > an improvement on noatime.
>
>The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks

Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like 
bash does?


Jan
-- 
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/