[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070212175526.GC2112@lazybastard.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:55:26 +0000
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>,
val_henson@...ux.interl.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Documenting MS_RELATIME
On Mon, 12 February 2007 18:49:39 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> >The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks
>
> Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like
> bash does?
Just a guess: because it has to compare the time?
Bash can simply compare mtime of (single) mailbox with time of last
login. Mutt would have to compare mtime of (many) mailboxes with...
I believe with atime of mailboxes.
Jörn
--
Joern's library part 1:
http://lwn.net/Articles/2.6-kernel-api/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists