| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:55:26 +0000 From: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>, val_henson@...ux.interl.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Documenting MS_RELATIME On Mon, 12 February 2007 18:49:39 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote: > > > >The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks > > Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like > bash does? Just a guess: because it has to compare the time? Bash can simply compare mtime of (single) mailbox with time of last login. Mutt would have to compare mtime of (many) mailboxes with... I believe with atime of mailboxes. Jörn -- Joern's library part 1: http://lwn.net/Articles/2.6-kernel-api/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists