linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [10/29] i386: don't include bugs.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200702121933.06431.andi@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:33:06 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, patches@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [10/29] i386: don't include bugs.h


> > Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
> > +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
> > @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/list.h>
> >  #include <asm/alternative.h>
> >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> > -#include <asm/bugs.h>
> >  
> >  static int no_replacement    = 0;
> >  static int smp_alt_once      = 0;
> 
> Didn't your patchset also include a near-identical patch from Adrian
> Bunk (with - and + exchanged)?

Good catch. I will remove both patches.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/