linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070213081023.1fc951ff.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:10:23 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:11:14 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Monday 12 February 2007 17:51, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > setcc() in math-emu is written as a gcc extension statement expression
> > macro that returns a value.  However, it's not used that way and it's not
> > needed like that, so just make it a do-while non-extension macro so that we
> > don't use an extension when it's not needed.
> > 
> 
> The patch looks good but it doesn't match the description any more, since
> you now use a function...

Hi Arnd,
Someone else had that same comment, so I sent a corrected patch
(description change only) to that mail.

Thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/