linux-kernel - Re: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)" to "array_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45D16BF8.9090409@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:42:48 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Ben Nizette <ben.nizette@...et.net.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)"
 to "array_for_each(index, array)"

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:19 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
>>>> #define array_for_each(element, array) \
>>>>	for (int __idx = 0; __idx < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); \
>>>>		__idx++, (element) = &(array[__idx]))
>>
>>If you really wanted to introduce your loop, then please call it
>>array_for_each_idx, or something to distinguish it.
> 
> 
> perhaps:
> 
> #define array_for_each(element, array) \
> 	for ((element) = (array); \
> 	     (element) < ((array) + ARRAY_SIZE((array))); \
> 	     (element)++)

If you're going for consistency, then shouldn't this be
array_for_each_entry()?

> #define array_for_each_index(index, array) \
> 	for ((index) = 0; (index) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); (index)++)

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/