linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] coredump: core dump masking support v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45D30DEA.4020309@hitachi.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:26:02 +0900
From:	"Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@...hat.com>,
	"Hideo AOKI@...hat" <haoki@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] coredump: core dump masking support v2

Hi,

I'm sorry that I couldn't reply you sooner.

Pavel Machek wrote:
>>Okay, I'll adopt your idea in the next version.
>>I'm going to provide the proc entry as follows:
>>
>>  (1) /proc/<pid>/core_flags/flags
>>  (2) /proc/<pid>/core_flags/omit_anon_shared
>>
>>(1) is the same as current core_flags. It is for expert users.
>>(2) corresponds to one bit in (1).
>>If (2) is set to 1, anonymous shared memory of the process is never
>>dumped.
> 
> Now, that's what I call an ugly interface.

I considered for a while, and then I decided not to use the
above-stated interfaces. Instead, I'll create just one proc entry
to access to one core dump flag:
  /proc/<pid>/coredump_omit_anonymous_shared

I think it is simple enough.
Would you think it is still ugly?

> Can we simply add ulimit with boolean value, that says dump
> anon_shared... or not? It will be simpler and faster, because you'll
> not need locking.

Yes, using ulimit will be simpler and faster, but less flexible.
The core dump flags can be changed only before running the program.
If the user modifies the program, the user will be able to change the
flags anytime. But the user can't always modify the program.

I need the ability to change the core dump flags anytime.

Thanks,
-- 
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/