[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070214132834.GA4436@Ahmed>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:28:34 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
Cc: Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] natsemi: Add support for using MII port with no PHY
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:02:04AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Signed-Off-By: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
>
[...]
> - if (np->phy_addr_external == PHY_ADDR_NONE) {
> + /* If we're ignoring the PHY it doesn't matter if we can't
> + * find one. */
> + if (!np->ignore_phy && np->phy_addr_external == PHY_ADDR_NONE) {
[...]
> + if (!np->ignore_phy) {
> + /* The link status field is latched: it remains low
> + * after a temporary link failure until it's read. We
> + * need the current link status, thus read twice.
> + */
> + mdio_read(dev, MII_BMSR);
> + bmsr = mdio_read(dev, MII_BMSR);
[...]
> /*
> + * If we're ignoring the PHY then autoneg and the internal
> + * transciever are really not going to work so don't let the
> + * user select them.
> + */
> + if (np->ignore_phy && (ecmd->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE ||
A trivial comment actually, Is there a point to write multi-line comments
in two different formats ?
Thanks,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists