linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070214103743.3cb1c39c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:37:43 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	eranian@....hp.com
Cc:	perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	perfctr-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.20 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon

On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:29:32 -0800
Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:05:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com> wrote:
> > > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
> > 
> > Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
> 
> Could you please indicate the procedure to do this?

re-post the patches for review-and-possible-integration, as you did last
time, I guess.

> Do you "just" need a patch against your latest -mm tree?

You should only raise patches against -mm is there's a special need to do
that (usually: they're against something which is only in -mm).  Patches
against 2.6.21-rc1 should suit.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/