| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:49:55 -0700 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net> writes: > But, what do you do with Oracle that's asking maxfiles to be set to 0x10000, > while the default value might be enough for a system that's not running Oracle. > I'm afraid that giving boot time values to the max_* tunables we will loose all > the benefits from /proc (or /sys): it is impossible to anticipate what an OS > will be used for. So allowing such things to be changed without having to reboot > the machine is in my mind quite a powerful feature we should keep taking > adavntage of. I'm not saying remove user spaces' ability to set the denial-of-service limits. I'm saying if they need to be frequently changed we need to update the default so they are higher by default. There really is no cost in moving those values up and down it is just an arbitrary integer used in comparisons. But if we can make a good guess that still catches runaway programs before they kill the machine but also allows more programs to work out of the box we are in better shape. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists