[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45D418DC.5040605@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:25:00 +0100
From: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net> writes:
>
>
>>But, what do you do with Oracle that's asking maxfiles to be set to 0x10000,
>>while the default value might be enough for a system that's not running Oracle.
>>I'm afraid that giving boot time values to the max_* tunables we will loose all
>>the benefits from /proc (or /sys): it is impossible to anticipate what an OS
>>will be used for. So allowing such things to be changed without having to reboot
>>the machine is in my mind quite a powerful feature we should keep taking
>>adavntage of.
>
>
> I'm not saying remove user spaces' ability to set the
> denial-of-service limits. I'm saying if they need to be frequently
> changed we need to update the default so they are higher by default.
>
> There really is no cost in moving those values up and down it is just
> an arbitrary integer used in comparisons. But if we can make a good
> guess that still catches runaway programs before they kill the machine
> but also allows more programs to work out of the box we are in better
> shape.
>
OK, happy to see we are on the same wavelength (and sorry for
misunderstanding what you were saying ;-) )
Regards,
Nadia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists